Speaker summary
94%1 analyzed article/video16 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Inter-American Commission on Human Rights results contain 1 faulty reasoning type, including Appeal to Authority, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 16 hits. Analysis detected 16 faulty-reasoning hits from 16 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of 93% (1,777 of 25,397 speakers). This Inter-American Commission on Human Rights is worse (more manipulative) than 93.00% of the peer group.
Inter-American Commission on Human Rights

Analyzed articles and videos