Speaker summary
⁠95%1 analyzed article/video35 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Institute for Socioeconomic Studies results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 35 hits. Analysis detected 70 faulty-reasoning hits from 35 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠94% (2,302 of 35,904 speakers). This Institute for Socioeconomic Studies is worse (more manipulative) than 93.60% of the peer group.
Institute for Socioeconomic Studies
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠94%Institute for Socioeconomic Studies (selected)100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 35
Article count: 1
Authors

Analyzed articles and videos