Speaker summary
52%4 analyzed articles/videos162 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Institute for Justice results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Burden of Proof, and Confirmation Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 29.3% saturation with 65.524 hits. Analysis detected 387.776 faulty-reasoning hits from 162 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 14.2% and a BS Rank of 21% (22,506 of 28,364 speakers). This Institute for Justice is better (less manipulative) than 79.30% of the peer group.
Institute for Justice
Speaker details