Speaker summary
⁠96%1 analyzed article/video27 analyzed words
BS Summary: These independent Senator Angus King results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Burden of Proof, and Confirmation Bias, with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 27 hits. Analysis detected 135 faulty-reasoning hits from 27 analyzed words across 1 video, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠94% (2,385 of 37,976 speakers). This independent Senator Angus King is worse (more manipulative) than 93.70% of the peer group.
independent Senator Angus King
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠94%independent Senator Angus King (selected)100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 27
Video count: 1
Authors
?

Analyzed articles and videos