Speaker summary
95%1 analyzed article/video33 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Independent Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 33 hits. Analysis detected 99 faulty-reasoning hits from 33 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of 94% (2,270 of 35,883 speakers). This Independent Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards is worse (more manipulative) than 93.70% of the peer group.
Independent Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards
Speaker details