Speaker summary
⁠95%1 analyzed article/video33 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Human Rights Watch and the ACLU results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect and Politically Left Leaning Bias, with False Dilemma as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 33 hits. Analysis detected 99 faulty-reasoning hits from 33 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠93% (1,398 of 19,918 speakers). This Human Rights Watch and the ACLU is worse (more manipulative) than 93.00% of the peer group.
Human Rights Watch and the ACLU
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Science2%
⁠93%Human Rights Watch and the ACLU (selected)100%
⁠100%988 National & Suicide Crisis Lifeline100%
⁠100%5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 33
Article count: 1
Authors

Analyzed articles and videos