Speaker summary
69%17 analyzed articles/videos810.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Human Rights Watch results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Availability Heuristic, and Negativity Bias, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 16.1% saturation with 177.534 hits. Analysis detected 2,013.312 faulty-reasoning hits from 810.667 analyzed words across 17 articles, generating a BS Score of 6.2% and a BS Rank of 5% (27,171 of 28,364 speakers). This Human Rights Watch is better (less manipulative) than 95.80% of the peer group.
Human Rights Watch
Speaker details