Speaker summary
ā 33%1 analyzed article/video147 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Human Rights Tribunal results contain 1 faulty reasoning type, including Appeal to Authority, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 20.4% saturation with 30 hits. Analysis detected 30 faulty-reasoning hits from 147 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 20.4% and a BS Rank of ā 33% (19,058 of 28,364 speakers). This Human Rights Tribunal is better (less manipulative) than 67.20% of the peer group.
Human Rights Tribunal
Speaker details