Speaker summary
95%1 analyzed article/video52 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Human rights organisations results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias and Appeal to Emotion, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 52 hits. Analysis detected 130 faulty-reasoning hits from 52 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 83.3% and a BS Rank of 81% (4,105 of 21,636 speakers). This Human rights organisations is worse (more manipulative) than 81.00% of the peer group.
Human rights organisations
Speaker details