Speaker summary
48% 6 analyzed articles/videos 749 analyzed words
BS Summary: These House Ethics Committee results contain 15 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Framing Effect , and Negativity Bias , with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 8.5% saturation with 141 hits . Analysis detected 986.4 faulty-reasoning hits from 749 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 6.1% and a BS Rank of 5% (38,650 of 40,544 speakers). This House Ethics Committee is better (less manipulative) than 95.30% of the peer group. House Ethics Committee
Speaker details
Total words: 749
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
5% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 4.7% percentile 6.1% BS Score6 analyzed videos749 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 8.3% 8.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 2.0% 2.0% Horn Effect Sitewide 1.0% Speaker 13.0% 13.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 8.3% 8.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 8.5% 8.5% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 6.7% 6.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 5.0% 5.0% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Speaker 6.9% 6.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 10.8% 10.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Speaker 1.6% 1.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 8.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 8.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 15.9% Horn Effect: Speaker 13.0%, sitewide 1.0% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 10.8%, sitewide 7.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 8.5%, sitewide 0.8% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 8.0%, sitewide 8.1% False Dilemma: Speaker 6.9%, sitewide 1.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 6.7%, sitewide 0.0% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 1.9% Indoctrination: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 0.0% Actor-Observer Bias: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 0.6% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst