Speaker summary
95%1 analyzed article/video24 analyzed words
BS Summary: These House Appropriations Committee results contain 1 faulty reasoning type, including Framing Effect, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 24 hits. Analysis detected 24 faulty-reasoning hits from 24 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of 94% (1,683 of 25,149 speakers). This House Appropriations Committee is worse (more manipulative) than 93.30% of the peer group.
House Appropriations Committee
Speaker details