Speaker summary
⁠96%1 analyzed article/video40 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hill and colleagues results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including False Dilemma, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 40 hits. Analysis detected 80 faulty-reasoning hits from 40 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠95% (2,283 of 38,387 speakers). This Hill and colleagues is worse (more manipulative) than 94.10% of the peer group.
Hill and colleagues
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠95%Hill and colleagues (selected)100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 40
Article count: 1
Authors

Analyzed articles and videos