Speaker summary
79%1 analyzed article/video56.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Helen Paavola results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Unattributed Quote, and Availability Heuristic, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 46 hits. Analysis detected 159 faulty-reasoning hits from 56.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 54.5% and a BS Rank of 73% (7,733 of 28,364 speakers). This Helen Paavola is worse (more manipulative) than 72.70% of the peer group.
Helen Paavola
Speaker details