Speaker summary
52%1 analyzed article/video41 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hagan Scotten results contain 1 faulty reasoning type, including Ad Hominem, with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 80.5% saturation with 33 hits. Analysis detected 33 faulty-reasoning hits from 41 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 80.5% and a BS Rank of 82% (4,882 of 26,505 speakers). This Hagan Scotten is worse (more manipulative) than 81.60% of the peer group.
Hagan Scotten
Speaker details