Speaker summary
56%1 analyzed article/video49.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gustavo Alfaro results contain 12 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem, Biased Writer Voice, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 32.6% saturation with 30 hits. Analysis detected 160.77 faulty-reasoning hits from 49.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 17.4% and a BS Rank of 28% (20,640 of 28,364 speakers). This Gustavo Alfaro is better (less manipulative) than 72.80% of the peer group.
Gustavo Alfaro
Speaker details