Speaker summary
⁠95%1 analyzed article/video79.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gregg Nunziata results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, In-Group Bias, and Ad Hominem, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 106 hits. Analysis detected 323.75 faulty-reasoning hits from 79.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 69.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠78% (4,667 of 21,084 speakers). This Gregg Nunziata is worse (more manipulative) than 77.90% of the peer group.
Gregg Nunziata
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Science2%
⁠78%Gregg Nunziata (selected)70%
⁠100%988 National & Suicide Crisis Lifeline100%
⁠100%5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 79.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Analyzed articles and videos