Speaker summary
⁠85%1 analyzed article/video118 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Graham Nordone results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 39.8% saturation with 47 hits. Analysis detected 85 faulty-reasoning hits from 118 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 36% and a BS Rank of ⁠57% (17,708 of 40,901 speakers). This Graham Nordone is worse (more manipulative) than 56.70% of the peer group.
Graham Nordone
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠57%Graham Nordone (selected)37%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 118
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

57% percentile
025507510056.7% percentile
36.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos118 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 32.2%32.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 39.8%39.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 39.8%, sitewide 26.9%Anecdotal: Speaker 32.2%, sitewide 5.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos