Speaker summary
69%1 analyzed article/video43 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gil Scott-Heron results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias and Politically Left Leaning Bias, with False Dilemma as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 39 hits. Analysis detected 117 faulty-reasoning hits from 43 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of 95% (2,034 of 37,945 speakers). This Gil Scott-Heron is worse (more manipulative) than 94.60% of the peer group.
Gil Scott-Heron
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
0%The Brookings Institution1%
0%Conor Heffernan1%
0%Gen Jack Keane1%
0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
95%Gil Scott-Heron (selected)100%
100%314 Action Fund100%
100%21 Grams100%
100%2035 Initiative100%
100%1X representative100%
100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 43
Article count: 1
Authors

Analyzed articles and videos