Speaker summary
⁠96%1 analyzed article/video31 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Georgia Advocacy Office results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, with Burden of Proof as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 31 hits. Analysis detected 62 faulty-reasoning hits from 31 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠95% (2,037 of 38,437 speakers). This Georgia Advocacy Office is worse (more manipulative) than 94.70% of the peer group.
Georgia Advocacy Office
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠95%Georgia Advocacy Office (selected)100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 31
Article count: 1
Authors

Analyzed articles and videos