Speaker summary
96%1 analyzed article/video30 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Georgetown University's Medicare Policy Initiative results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 30 hits. Analysis detected 60 faulty-reasoning hits from 30 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of 95% (1,736 of 31,611 speakers). This Georgetown University's Medicare Policy Initiative is worse (more manipulative) than 94.50% of the peer group.
Georgetown University's Medicare Policy Initiative
Speaker details