Speaker summary
⁠97%1 analyzed article/video31 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fox News’ Laura Ingraham results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Begging the Question, Biased Writer Voice, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 31 hits. Analysis detected 186 faulty-reasoning hits from 31 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠95% (2,000 of 40,167 speakers). This Fox News’ Laura Ingraham is worse (more manipulative) than 95.00% of the peer group.
Fox News’ Laura Ingraham
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠95%Fox News’ Laura Ingraham (selected)100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 31
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

95% percentile
025507510095.0% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos31 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 100.0%100.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 15.9%Begging the Question: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 1.7%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 26.9%Indoctrination: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 0.0%In-Group Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 6.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos