Speaker summary
96%1 analyzed article/video32 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Foltz results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause) and Availability Heuristic, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 71.9% saturation with 23 hits. Analysis detected 55 faulty-reasoning hits from 32 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 57.3% and a BS Rank of 74% (7,389 of 28,364 speakers). This Foltz is worse (more manipulative) than 74.00% of the peer group.
Foltz
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details

Analyzed articles and videos