Speaker summary
96%1 analyzed article/video46 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Financial Times (FT) results contain 1 faulty reasoning type, including Recency Bias, with Recency Bias as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 46 hits. Analysis detected 46 faulty-reasoning hits from 46 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of 95% (1,049 of 19,073 speakers). This Financial Times (FT) is worse (more manipulative) than 94.50% of the peer group.
Financial Times (FT)
Speaker details