Speaker summary
96%1 analyzed article/video34 analyzed words
BS Summary: These federal weather officials results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 34 hits. Analysis detected 68 faulty-reasoning hits from 34 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of 96% (1,555 of 31,601 speakers). This federal weather officials is worse (more manipulative) than 95.10% of the peer group.
federal weather officials
Speaker details
Total words: 34
Article count: 1
Authors