Speaker summary
96%1 analyzed article/video28 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Families for Justice as Healing results contain 1 faulty reasoning type, including Confirmation Bias, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 28 hits. Analysis detected 28 faulty-reasoning hits from 28 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of 95% (1,302 of 25,463 speakers). This Families for Justice as Healing is worse (more manipulative) than 94.90% of the peer group.
Families for Justice as Healing
Speaker details