Speaker summary
⁠83%1 analyzed article/video44 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Erin Zalinski results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias, Slippery Slope, and Loss Aversion, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 86% saturation with 37.854 hits. Analysis detected 155.854 faulty-reasoning hits from 44 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 42.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠61% (11,326 of 28,364 speakers). This Erin Zalinski is worse (more manipulative) than 60.10% of the peer group.
Erin Zalinski
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠61%Erin Zalinski (selected)43%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 44
Article count: 1
Authors

Analyzed articles and videos