Speaker summary
68%1 analyzed article/video62.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Eric Hobsbawm results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Halo Effect, and Unattributed Quote, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 84% saturation with 59.25 hits. Analysis detected 104.25 faulty-reasoning hits from 62.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 33% and a BS Rank of 52% (13,881 of 28,364 speakers). This Eric Hobsbawm is worse (more manipulative) than 51.10% of the peer group.
Eric Hobsbawm
Speaker details