Speaker summary
56% 4 analyzed articles/videos 539.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Enes Kanter Freedom results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Straw Man , and Confirmation Bias , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 12.8% saturation with 112 hits . Analysis detected 965.975 faulty-reasoning hits from 539.667 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.5% and a BS Rank of 4% (43,450 of 45,144 speakers). This Enes Kanter Freedom is better (less manipulative) than 96.20% of the peer group. Enes Kanter Freedom
Speaker details
Total words: 539.667
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
4% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 3.8% percentile 5.5% BS Score4 analyzed videos539.7 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 3.2% 3.2% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 12.4% 12.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 2.5% 2.5% Straw Man Sitewide 0.9% Speaker 14.1% 14.1% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Speaker 12.7% 12.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 1.6% 1.6% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 7.4% 7.4% Status Quo Bias Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 6.6% 6.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Speaker 8.9% 8.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 3.0% 3.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 12.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 15.9% Straw Man: Speaker 14.1%, sitewide 0.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 12.8%, sitewide 11.1% False Dilemma: Speaker 12.7%, sitewide 1.5% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 9.4%, sitewide 7.5% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 8.9%, sitewide 4.6% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 8.1% Begging the Question: Speaker 7.4%, sitewide 1.7% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 6.6%, sitewide 2.2% Optimism Bias: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 5.3% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 3.7% Ad Hominem: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 2.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 0.8% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 1.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% No True Scotsman: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 0.1% Tu Quoque: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst