Speaker summary
⁠82%1 analyzed article/video39 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Emma Smith results contain 1 faulty reasoning type, including Appeal to Authority, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 39 hits. Analysis detected 39 faulty-reasoning hits from 39 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠96% (1,663 of 37,785 speakers). This Emma Smith is worse (more manipulative) than 95.60% of the peer group.
Emma Smith
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠96%Emma Smith (selected)100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 39
Article count: 1
Authors

Analyzed articles and videos