Speaker summary
47%1 analyzed article/video34.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Emma Cachot results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Begging the Question, In-Group Bias, and Quote-first Misdirection, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 52 hits. Analysis detected 130 faulty-reasoning hits from 34.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 62.5% and a BS Rank of 75% (4,895 of 19,370 speakers). This Emma Cachot is worse (more manipulative) than 74.70% of the peer group.
Emma Cachot
Speaker details