Speaker summary
ā 73% 1 analyzed article/video 394.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Eliza Varadi results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination , Unattributed Quote , and Confirmation Bias , with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 14.4% saturation with 93 hits . Analysis detected 643.331 faulty-reasoning hits from 394.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.1% and a BS Rank of ā 5% (42,576 of 44,720 speakers). This Eliza Varadi is better (less manipulative) than 95.20% of the peer group. Eliza Varadi
Speaker details
Total words: 394.5
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
5% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 4.8% percentile 6.1% BS Score1 analyzed videos394.5 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0ā25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 15.6% 15.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 3.1% 3.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Speaker 14.4% 14.4% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 9.0% 9.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Speaker 10.6% 10.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 3.0% 3.0% Circular Reasoning Sitewide 0.1% Speaker 5.8% 5.8% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 5.3% 5.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 4.7% 4.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Speaker 3.9% 3.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 5% 5% 10% 10% 15% 15% 20% 20% 25% 25% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 15.9% Indoctrination: Speaker 15.6%, sitewide 0.0% Anecdotal: Speaker 14.4%, sitewide 5.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 10.6%, sitewide 3.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 9.0%, sitewide 1.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 7.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 6.9% Circular Reasoning: Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 0.1% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 4.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 0.8% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 3.3% Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 1.9% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 2.2% Loss Aversion: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 1.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst