Speaker summary
⁠39%1 analyzed article/video41.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Elim Chan results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Appeal to Emotion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 33.3% saturation with 25 hits. Analysis detected 60 faulty-reasoning hits from 41.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 20% and a BS Rank of ⁠32% (19,287 of 28,364 speakers). This Elim Chan is better (less manipulative) than 68.00% of the peer group.
Elim Chan
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠32%Elim Chan (selected)20%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 41.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Analyzed articles and videos