Speaker summary
76%1 analyzed article/video104 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Edwin Santana results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem, Hasty Generalization, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 42.3% saturation with 49.5 hits. Analysis detected 385.75 faulty-reasoning hits from 104 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 32.7% and a BS Rank of 51% (13,963 of 28,364 speakers). This Edwin Santana is worse (more manipulative) than 50.80% of the peer group.
Edwin Santana
Speaker details