Speaker summary
⁠34%2 analyzed articles/videos124 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ed Sapienza results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias and Appeal to Emotion, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 20.8% saturation with 30 hits. Analysis detected 88 faulty-reasoning hits from 124 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 20.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠35% (28,993 of 44,420 speakers). This Ed Sapienza is better (less manipulative) than 65.30% of the peer group.
Ed Sapienza
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠35%Ed Sapienza (selected)21%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 124
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

35% percentile
025507510034.7% percentile
20.4% BS Score2 analyzed videos124 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 20.8%20.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 20.8%20.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 19.4%19.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 20.8%, sitewide 8.1%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 20.8%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 19.4%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos