Speaker summary
70%2 analyzed articles/videos89.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ed Mead results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Politically Left Leaning Bias, and Halo Effect, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 55 hits. Analysis detected 217 faulty-reasoning hits from 89.667 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 62.5% and a BS Rank of 78% (8,437 of 37,854 speakers). This Ed Mead is worse (more manipulative) than 77.70% of the peer group.
Ed Mead
Speaker details