Speaker summary
40%1 analyzed article/video108 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Earle Fisher results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 33.3% saturation with 36 hits. Analysis detected 72 faulty-reasoning hits from 108 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 33.3% and a BS Rank of 54% (16,747 of 35,742 speakers). This Earle Fisher is worse (more manipulative) than 53.10% of the peer group.
Earle Fisher
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
0%The Brookings Institution1%
0%Conor Heffernan1%
0%Gen Jack Keane1%
0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
54%Earle Fisher (selected)34%
100%314 Action Fund100%
100%21 Grams100%
100%2035 Initiative100%
100%1X representative100%
100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 108
Article count: 1
Authors

Analyzed articles and videos