Speaker summary
⁠97%1 analyzed article/video35 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Earl Stephens results contain 1 faulty reasoning type, including Appeal to Authority, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 35 hits. Analysis detected 35 faulty-reasoning hits from 35 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠96% (1,586 of 37,786 speakers). This Earl Stephens is worse (more manipulative) than 95.80% of the peer group.
Earl Stephens
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠96%Earl Stephens (selected)100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 35
Article count: 1
Authors

Analyzed articles and videos