Speaker summary
⁠97%1 analyzed article/video13 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dr. Natasha Bagarian results contain 1 faulty reasoning type, including Halo Effect, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 13 hits. Analysis detected 13 faulty-reasoning hits from 13 analyzed words across 1 video, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠96% (1,570 of 38,195 speakers). This Dr. Natasha Bagarian is worse (more manipulative) than 95.90% of the peer group.
Dr. Natasha Bagarian
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠96%Dr. Natasha Bagarian (selected)100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 13
Video count: 1
Authors
?

Analyzed articles and videos