Speaker summary
75% 1 analyzed article/video 94.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Diane Russell results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic , False Dilemma , and Status Quo Bias , with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 24.7% saturation with 40 hits . Analysis detected 223.47 faulty-reasoning hits from 94.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 25.4% and a BS Rank of 44% (25,418 of 45,124 speakers). This Diane Russell is better (less manipulative) than 56.30% of the peer group. Diane Russell
Speaker details
Total words: 94.667
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
44% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 43.7% percentile 25.4% BS Score1 analyzed videos94.7 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Speaker 53.7% 53.7% Status Quo Bias Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 53.7% 53.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 29.0% 29.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 24.7% 24.7% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 13.6% 13.6% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 13.6% 13.6% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 13.6% 13.6% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 13.6% 13.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 13.6% 13.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% False Dilemma: Speaker 53.7%, sitewide 1.5% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 53.7%, sitewide 2.2% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 29.0%, sitewide 9.1% Framing Effect: Speaker 13.6%, sitewide 26.9% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 24.7%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 13.6%, sitewide 15.9% Begging the Question: Speaker 13.6%, sitewide 1.7% Indoctrination: Speaker 13.6%, sitewide 0.0% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 13.6%, sitewide 1.1% False Dilemma Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst