Speaker summary
⁠98%1 analyzed article/video38 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Department of Social Services officials results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Blind-Spot Bias, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 38 hits. Analysis detected 76 faulty-reasoning hits from 38 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠97% (1,465 of 39,173 speakers). This Department of Social Services officials is worse (more manipulative) than 96.30% of the peer group.
Department of Social Services officials
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠97%Department of Social Services officials (selected)100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 38
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

96% percentile
025507510096.3% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos38 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Blind-Spot BiasSitewide 0.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 0.8%Blind-Spot Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 0.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos