Speaker summary
97%1 analyzed article/video60 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Delhi court results contain 1 faulty reasoning type, including Appeal to Authority, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 60 hits. Analysis detected 60 faulty-reasoning hits from 60 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of 96% (955 of 23,148 speakers). This Delhi court is worse (more manipulative) than 95.90% of the peer group.
Delhi court
Speaker details