Speaker summary
⁠98%1 analyzed article/video29 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Defense experts results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 29 hits. Analysis detected 87 faulty-reasoning hits from 29 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠97% (1,377 of 37,925 speakers). This Defense experts is worse (more manipulative) than 96.40% of the peer group.
Defense experts
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠97%Defense experts (selected)100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 29
Article count: 1
Authors

Analyzed articles and videos