Speaker summary
70%1 analyzed article/video52.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These David Zucker results contain 1 faulty reasoning type, including Halo Effect, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 35 hits. Analysis detected 35 faulty-reasoning hits from 52.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of 97% (1,355 of 37,796 speakers). This David Zucker is worse (more manipulative) than 96.40% of the peer group.
David Zucker
Speaker details