Speaker summary
81%1 analyzed article/video408 analyzed words
BS Summary: These David Stras results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including False Dilemma, Framing Effect, and Anchoring Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 25.2% saturation with 103 hits. Analysis detected 643 faulty-reasoning hits from 408 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 9.3% and a BS Rank of 10% (25,565 of 28,364 speakers). This David Stras is better (less manipulative) than 90.10% of the peer group.
David Stras
Speaker details