Speaker summary
79%8 analyzed articles/videos475.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These David Sacks results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Genetic Fallacy, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 25.1% saturation with 220 hits. Analysis detected 2,098.158 faulty-reasoning hits from 475.667 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 10.3% and a BS Rank of 12% (24,964 of 28,364 speakers). This David Sacks is better (less manipulative) than 88.00% of the peer group.