Speaker summary
82%2 analyzed articles/videos62 analyzed words
BS Summary: These David Petraeus results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 71% saturation with 44 hits. Analysis detected 104 faulty-reasoning hits from 62 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 41.9% and a BS Rank of 60% (11,437 of 28,364 speakers). This David Petraeus is worse (more manipulative) than 59.70% of the peer group.
David Petraeus
Speaker details