Speaker summary
82%1 analyzed article/video41 analyzed words
BS Summary: These David Pakman results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Politically Left Leaning Bias, with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 41 hits. Analysis detected 164 faulty-reasoning hits from 41 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of 97% (1,342 of 37,785 speakers). This David Pakman is worse (more manipulative) than 96.50% of the peer group.
David Pakman
Speaker details