Speaker summary
ā 85%1 analyzed article/video94.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These David Johns results contain 12 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Begging the Question, and In-Group Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 75.1% saturation with 71.111 hits. Analysis detected 428.736 faulty-reasoning hits from 94.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 31.5% and a BS Rank of ā 50% (14,346 of 28,364 speakers). This David Johns is better (less manipulative) than 50.60% of the peer group.
David Johns
Speaker details