Speaker summary
ā 31%1 analyzed article/video68 analyzed words
BS Summary: These David Isom results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal and Burden of Proof, with Actor-Observer Bias as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 51 hits. Analysis detected 153 faulty-reasoning hits from 68 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 50% and a BS Rank of ā 70% (8,678 of 28,364 speakers). This David Isom is worse (more manipulative) than 69.40% of the peer group.
David Isom
Speaker details