Speaker summary
70%1 analyzed article/video47.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These David Broderick results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem, Hasty Generalization, and Negativity Bias, with Fundamental Attribution Error as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 35 hits. Analysis detected 140 faulty-reasoning hits from 47.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 73.6% and a BS Rank of 79% (4,077 of 18,945 speakers). This David Broderick is worse (more manipulative) than 78.50% of the peer group.
David Broderick
Speaker details